4. Foster talks about the relationship between the reader and the writer suggesting that, “reading is an event of the imagination…a reader’s imagination is the act of one creative intelligence engaging another (the writer’s). How does this occur? What does this suggest about the nature and process of reading and writing?
Anytime a reader engages in a new piece of literature, a relationship is established. From the moment the book is opened, the reader and the writer have made a new connection. The writer’s creative intelligence works with that of the reader in order to create a beautiful novel. In a sense, it is like an artist creating a new masterpiece. Elaborating on this comparison, imagine that thirty people were handed Foster’s book and the same blank canvas. They were told to read the text, then create a portrait based on what they read. When the thirty readers finish their paintings, the end result is most likely going to be thirty completely different portraits from the individual readers. This is because each person who read “How to Read Literature Like a Professor” established their own relationship with Foster. In doing this, each relationship resulted in a different, unique interpretation of the book/painting, despite being given the same materials to start with. So, what Foster is suggesting is reading itself is an art, and art is interpretive. Although every reader is given the same base creativity from the writer, they establish a personal connection through their own creative intelligence and make the book their own.
The film and theatre industries both demonstrate the concept that the connection between the reader and writer is unique and up for interpretation. The actors, for instance, interpret the work of writers for a living. They are given their script, and it is their job to make a connection with the writer’s work. They must combine the creativity of the writer with their own artistry as the reader, and somehow interpret what it is their character is supposed to be like and how the scene should be performed. As an actor in shows on occasion, I too, have had to make that creative connection with what I am reading and interpret the writer’s creative vision with my own. The actors’ combined interpretations, along with interpretations of directors and anyone else involved with a performance or an upcoming film, show the unique connection that is made is subjective based on the creative intelligence of the reader.
Your point on the blank canvas and that thirty people would all have a different picture, resonates with me. As I read a new work of literature, I always make the characters personal towards me. I think about what they look like, what they sound like, and what their attitude is. As I know, no one would have the same interpretation as me, like you said above, but it establishes a relationship.
ReplyDeleteAs well as film, you can see the person develop into the character in the book, or the script, which is truly a work of art. After they seemingly are that person, you are connected to them, wondering what they're thinking, why they're crying, and so on. Reading is definitely an event of imagination and connecting with the authors creative intelligence, but the concept of each character, plot, and setting is different among all.
I love that you included that part about the blank canvas experiment. It made me look at the idea of the relationship between the writer and reader completely differently. Honestly, I did not know how to answer this prompt at all, so I chose different ones, but the way you explained it cleared everything up for me. I think the way each reader interprets the text makes it special to themselves. They can find ways to relate it to their own lives, which highlight different parts of the book as important. Having been in a couple shows, I totally agree that actors need to connect with the work. My directors have said not to pay too much attention to the Broadway versions of the shows and to make the show our own. The unique connection between reader and writer creates a new experience for an audience.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you and couldn’t have said it better myself, when Foster discusses our imaginations and how every single person has a different one, even if a few are similar they are never exactly alike. This is a great and very unique thing however, because thinking the same thing would not be essential because everyone would have the same opinion and really what’s the point in that. Our imagination gives readers the opportunity to relate with people in the book or just he author, this being good for the authors rates, but also great for the reader to experience and have something in common with the characters in the book. However, this also relates to the outside world and how we have debates and politicians to fight others opinions and either challenge or agree but with slightly different words and I think that is a crucial thing to have in the world.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you and couldn’t have said it better myself, when Foster discusses our imaginations and how every single person has a different one, even if a few are similar they are never exactly alike. This is a great and very unique thing however, because thinking the same thing would not be essential because everyone would have the same opinion and really what’s the point in that. Our imagination gives readers the opportunity to relate with people in the book or just he author, this being good for the authors rates, but also great for the reader to experience and have something in common with the characters in the book. However, this also relates to the outside world and how we have debates and politicians to fight others opinions and either challenge or agree but with slightly different words and I think that is a crucial thing to have in the world.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteI agree with the points you made, the blank canvas experiment you used allowed me to understand the connection between the author and reader more than I did. Your post made me want to go back and reread some of the chapters I didn’t connect with. When I did that my connection with Foster grew and allowed my understanding for the whole book to grow, because I now had all the chapters pieced together in my mind. I also agree with your points about the actors being unique in every character, because creativity gives readers/viewers the chance to follow new paths in their mind or life.